Making sense of the intersection between media, society and technology
I tend to think of Google as a media, rather than a technology, business. And now it has thrown itself headfirst into the business of online video, snapping up YouTube for US$1.65bn.
The deal ends a weekend of speculation. More significantly, it is a huge vote of confident in the future of video over the internet by one of the most influential companies around.
Quoted in The Times online, Google’s chief executive said:
“Most people believe this is just the beginning of the internet video revolution. YouTube is one of many investments we will be making.”
The popularity of YouTube and its clips of Mentos, Lonelygirl15 and more have surprised established media organisations.
So big broadcasters like CBS and ABC are rushing to offer their content online, while newspapers like The Washington Post, invest in training reporters to use video cameras.
I am not convinced that the success of YouTube means people want to watch video online. Why watch something on a small screen when you can watch it on a HD TV?
The internet, by its very nature, is an interactive medium. You want to click around and do stuff, not sit back and be passive.
The types of video that are popular on YouTube tend to be the news of the weird, or crazy funny stunts. And they are all short.
While people might lap up a short, funny three minute clip, I have yet yo be persuaded they will invest half an hour or more in online video.
The guys in Google are smart, but they seem to have paid a very high price to get into the business of online video.
This blog is run by Professor Alfred Hermida, an award-winning online news pioneer, digital media scholar and journalism educator.
No Responses to Has Google paid too much for YouTube?
Ed Henczel
October 10th, 2006 at 1:27 pm
I, too, thought Google paid way too much for YouTube.
But then their stocks jumped after the deal was announced and have stayed up (so far).
Go figure.
Ed
ignidgill
December 17th, 2007 at 10:06 am
I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:
Tom OKeefe
June 6th, 2008 at 8:44 am
Forbes estimates that YouTube will bring in $200 million in revenues for 2008. Plugging those estimates into the Bizak calculator we get an EPV of $0.21 and a Bizak Estimate of $758,000,016 – much lower than the $1.65 billion purchase price.
http://tomokeefe.com/2008/06/04/monetizing-youtube/