<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time for radical thinking in journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/</link>
	<description>This blog on media, society and technology is run by Professor Alfred Hermida, an award-winning online news pioneer, digital media scholar and journalism educator.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digitale Notizen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; fundamental shift in the mindset of journalists</title>
		<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Digitale Notizen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; fundamental shift in the mindset of journalists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>[...] Alfred Hermida (Prof an der University of BC in Vancouver) sammelt Postings, die sich mit den Veränderungen im Journalismus befassen und zieht selber ein Fazit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alfred Hermida (Prof an der University of BC in Vancouver) sammelt Postings, die sich mit den Veränderungen im Journalismus befassen und zieht selber ein Fazit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De nieuwe reporter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; De Nieuwe Reporter presenteert: de Nieuwemedia-Uitdaging 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>De nieuwe reporter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; De Nieuwe Reporter presenteert: de Nieuwemedia-Uitdaging 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/#comment-269</guid>
		<description>[...] presenteerde. Zie eventueel de reacties daarop van Poynter, nog eens Poynter, Steve Outing, Alfred Hermida en Mincy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] presenteerde. Zie eventueel de reacties daarop van Poynter, nog eens Poynter, Steve Outing, Alfred Hermida en Mincy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change. It&#8217;s not just a political buzzword. : the x degree: exploring and redefining multimedia storytelling</title>
		<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Change. It&#8217;s not just a political buzzword. : the x degree: exploring and redefining multimedia storytelling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/#comment-268</guid>
		<description>[...] We know it as a journalism buzzword, too. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We know it as a journalism buzzword, too. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newsroom leaders, change or step aside &#124; editor on the verge</title>
		<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Newsroom leaders, change or step aside &#124; editor on the verge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/#comment-267</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Outing, Mindy McAdams, Alfred Hermida and others have written about the need for varying degrees of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Outing, Mindy McAdams, Alfred Hermida and others have written about the need for varying degrees of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Online is still seen as the poor relation in my BBC local newsroom, left to its own devices with little or no interest from management.

The managers&#039; priority is still to make sure that the evening telly bulletin gets out to a dwindling number of viewers.

Meanwhile online, which can rack up more hits on one story than the entire viewing numbers for a local bulletin, gets ignored.

There is the odd 360 production to tick a box for those higher up. But there is still no enthusiasm for the interactive dimension online can bring to stories.

There is little questioning of online staff, who represent a small fraction of the total, about how they think the local output could be changed.

And ideas that could make a difference are dropped quietly.

It could be so different.

Already local newspapers are stealing a march on us with breaking news on their websites, blogs by reporters and video news, often compellingly presented.

Where are the blogs from BBC presenters and reporters? Just a mish-mash of websites that no-one apart from those who work on them understands.

For example the local Spotlight website still gives pride of place to a picture of its &quot;new&quot; co-presenter, who started in January 2006. Meanwhile local news online gets shoved into the bottom right hand corner.

It&#039;s risible and if Peter Horrocks is serious about change he needs to make sure everyone is involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online is still seen as the poor relation in my BBC local newsroom, left to its own devices with little or no interest from management.</p>
<p>The managers&#8217; priority is still to make sure that the evening telly bulletin gets out to a dwindling number of viewers.</p>
<p>Meanwhile online, which can rack up more hits on one story than the entire viewing numbers for a local bulletin, gets ignored.</p>
<p>There is the odd 360 production to tick a box for those higher up. But there is still no enthusiasm for the interactive dimension online can bring to stories.</p>
<p>There is little questioning of online staff, who represent a small fraction of the total, about how they think the local output could be changed.</p>
<p>And ideas that could make a difference are dropped quietly.</p>
<p>It could be so different.</p>
<p>Already local newspapers are stealing a march on us with breaking news on their websites, blogs by reporters and video news, often compellingly presented.</p>
<p>Where are the blogs from BBC presenters and reporters? Just a mish-mash of websites that no-one apart from those who work on them understands.</p>
<p>For example the local Spotlight website still gives pride of place to a picture of its &#8220;new&#8221; co-presenter, who started in January 2006. Meanwhile local news online gets shoved into the bottom right hand corner.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s risible and if Peter Horrocks is serious about change he needs to make sure everyone is involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Journalism Iconoclast</title>
		<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>The Journalism Iconoclast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>[...] Alfred Hermida says this will require a fundamental shift in the mindset of journalists: It is time to stop thinking about a journalism defined by the means of distribution. It is time to start thinking about a journalism defined by the journalism itself. In other words, how best to tell stories and reach audiences, using the most suitable tools across a multiplicity of platforms. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alfred Hermida says this will require a fundamental shift in the mindset of journalists: It is time to stop thinking about a journalism defined by the means of distribution. It is time to start thinking about a journalism defined by the journalism itself. In other words, how best to tell stories and reach audiences, using the most suitable tools across a multiplicity of platforms. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newsrooms leaders, change or step aside &#124; editor on the verge</title>
		<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Newsrooms leaders, change or step aside &#124; editor on the verge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Outing, Mindy McAdams, Alfred Hermida and others have written about the need for varying degrees of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Outing, Mindy McAdams, Alfred Hermida and others have written about the need for varying degrees of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knackeredhack</title>
		<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>knackeredhack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Peter, trad journalism tends to lack a genuine diversity in its ranks and the BBC seems to epitomise this.  Few editorial managers are tough enough to really shake that up, preferring to remain player-managers, to borrow a football analogy.

Diversity of experience produces good problem-solving and innovation. But, as I understand it, you now have the dual challenge of integrating a politically-charged culture into one newsroom from (three? or more?) while introducing more innovation.

What comes out of the coverage at the moment is a disdain for finance and a disdain for technology.  Unfortunately these are the main drivers of events these days.  Journalists need to be deeply curious about them, and critical. But they still seem to prefer political narratives.

Complexity requires collaboration.  Big organizations like the BBC, while they have the resources to scale that complexity for the time being, will tend to breed more politics.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, trad journalism tends to lack a genuine diversity in its ranks and the BBC seems to epitomise this.  Few editorial managers are tough enough to really shake that up, preferring to remain player-managers, to borrow a football analogy.</p>
<p>Diversity of experience produces good problem-solving and innovation. But, as I understand it, you now have the dual challenge of integrating a politically-charged culture into one newsroom from (three? or more?) while introducing more innovation.</p>
<p>What comes out of the coverage at the moment is a disdain for finance and a disdain for technology.  Unfortunately these are the main drivers of events these days.  Journalists need to be deeply curious about them, and critical. But they still seem to prefer political narratives.</p>
<p>Complexity requires collaboration.  Big organizations like the BBC, while they have the resources to scale that complexity for the time being, will tend to breed more politics.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Horrocks</title>
		<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Horrocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reportr.net/2008/01/04/time-for-radical-thinking-in-journalism/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Alf. Spot on. The need for dramatic innovation in 2008 is the main thing I have been discussing this week with senior colleagues at BBC News. The issue now is whether we can do more than talk about it in the first week of the year. I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll keep us up to the mark. Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alf. Spot on. The need for dramatic innovation in 2008 is the main thing I have been discussing this week with senior colleagues at BBC News. The issue now is whether we can do more than talk about it in the first week of the year. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll keep us up to the mark. Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

