<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The role of citizen journalism in mainstream news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/07/401/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/07/401/</link>
	<description>This blog on media, society and technology is run by Professor Alfred Hermida, an award-winning online news pioneer, digital media scholar and journalism educator.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pramit Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/07/401/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Pramit Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reportr.net/2008/01/07/401/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>A relevant comparisons can be made with Wikipedia, where users, like you and me, make stubs on latest issues (e.g. benazir bhutto assassination) and then the so-called Wikipedia regulars and insiders take over, polishing the entry in due time. All this while I can come again to the entry&#039;s page and add more data and more often than not I can be sure that some dedicated Wikipedian will correct the spelling, grammar and factual mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A relevant comparisons can be made with Wikipedia, where users, like you and me, make stubs on latest issues (e.g. benazir bhutto assassination) and then the so-called Wikipedia regulars and insiders take over, polishing the entry in due time. All this while I can come again to the entry&#8217;s page and add more data and more often than not I can be sure that some dedicated Wikipedian will correct the spelling, grammar and factual mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://www.reportr.net/2008/01/07/401/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reportr.net/2008/01/07/401/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>The 90 9 1 rule is not universal.  At Forrester Research (I&#039;m a social computing analyst) we perform &quot;technographic&quot; research to find out what types of technologies people use.

We&#039;ve found a trend between creators, joiners, critics, collectors, spectators and inactives.  They results? It depends on each market and segment.  For example, the Technographics of BBC&#039;s site for folks under 30 will be different for those over 50.

More details from Charlene

http://blogs.forrester.com/charleneli/2007/04/forresters_new_.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 90 9 1 rule is not universal.  At Forrester Research (I&#8217;m a social computing analyst) we perform &#8220;technographic&#8221; research to find out what types of technologies people use.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve found a trend between creators, joiners, critics, collectors, spectators and inactives.  They results? It depends on each market and segment.  For example, the Technographics of BBC&#8217;s site for folks under 30 will be different for those over 50.</p>
<p>More details from Charlene</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/charleneli/2007/04/forresters_new_.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.forrester.com/charleneli/2007/04/forresters_new_.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

