Making sense of the intersection between media, society and technology
In: BBC|broadcast|citizen journalism|journalism|user-generated content
1 Nov 2008
Image by garyturner via Flickr
Comments by a senior BBC News executive at the Media Society event, ‘Broadsheet vs Broadband’ in London offer an insight into how the corporation views user-generated content.
Pete Clifton, who has the unwieldy title of head of editorial development for multimedia journalism explained how UGC fit into the BBC’s newsgathering:
It’s gathering in insights that the audience have that we can make sense of and then making it part of our newsgathering process.
This approach limits the potential of UGC. The ability of the public to participate offers an opportunity for a new relationship with audiences – one in which journalists work with audiences and engage them in the various stages of the journalistic process.
This goes beyond viewing UGC as a source of news content, which needs to be controlled by professional journalists.
The BBC’s approach fits in with how other news outlets view content from the public, with journalists retaining a traditional gate-keeping role. At the BBC, the content is heavily moderated to verify its authenticity, as Clifton explained:
It’s gone through all the filters that our journalism would have gone through. It’s quite labour intensive. We’ve another arm of our newsgathering operation – it can ultimately add to the richness of what we do, but we shouldn’t take it lightly.
Again, this is also the view shared by other UK news publications with moderation and/or registration the norm as editors’ concerns over reputation, trust, and legal liabilities persist.
This approach frames UGC as a way of providing technical, editorial, and managerial processes that allow contributions from the public to be elicited, processed, and published by professional journalists.
As international research has show:
The bottom line is that, overall, online newspapers are eager to open interpretation to the audience, as this is coherent with their definition of the audience as audience. Access, distribution and even processing are open to a lesser extent, but selection is completely closed to participation, as this is the core of the journalistic profession.
As an aside, given that the BBC has integrated its TV, radio and online operations into a multimedia newsroom, should Clifton’s title lose the “multimedia” tag?
This blog is run by Professor Alfred Hermida, an award-winning online news pioneer, digital media scholar and journalism educator.
No Responses to User-generated content as a form of newsgathering
Bookmarks for October 23rd through November 4th by andydickinson.net
November 6th, 2008 at 7:55 am
[...] User-generated content as a form of newsgathering – Alf has a useful round up on the development of UGC via the BBC’s Pete Clifton. I think Alf’s last point about Multimedia is an interesting one. What’s the value of that word in the changing media landscape? [...]
Google wants more copy editors – not less! « Subs’ Standards
November 6th, 2008 at 11:39 am
[...] a thought backed up by Pete Clifton, senior BBC News exec, who supports journalist gate-keepers (aka editors?) for processing its UGC: It’s gone through all the filters that our journalism [...]
Links [15 Sept-18 Nov 2008] « Subs’ Standards
November 18th, 2008 at 6:29 am
[...] Gatekeeping your news UGC [...]
How Participatory is Local Journalism? « J-School: Educating Independent Journalists
November 30th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
[...] general results, though, first. My look at the Philly.com front page confirms what Domingo and other researchers have been finding– The bottom line is that, overall, online newspapers are eager to open [...]
Black Hills Business Blog » Blog Archive » Should workers get to text and use Twitter?
May 4th, 2009 at 1:04 pm
[...] I use them for personal reasons sometimes, but they can be invaluable as a information and and news-gathering tool. Heck, you’re reading my blog right [...]